My Mom Says I m Mentally Sound and Her Psychiatrist Has Declared Her a Fit Parent Again

As counselors, we come up in contact with clients who are angry or heartbroken and oftentimes experience defeated. This sense of pain and loss is frequently realized in the forensic setting in which I work with parents who are desperate to rebuild a parent-child human relationship that is severely damaged or estranged. I also work with children who assert that they never desire to encounter or speak with one of their parents again.

These are not parents who have abused or neglected their children. They are parents who previously had what would be characterized as a practiced relationship with their children — until the time of a separation or divorce. I have worked with families in which the conflict has continued for longer than ten years prior to therapy.

It should exist noted that many people in the helping professions refer to this troubled parent-child human relationship as "parental alienation." Through the years, various nomenclatures have been applied in an effort to give this pathological mail service-divorce miracle a name. But even as we settle on what to telephone call information technology, we must help these children and the counselors who work with them.

Most counselors working with children or families have witnessed this dynamic to varying degrees. There are ample articles on child alienation, yet many counselors remain conflicted nearly how to effectively care for these troubled parent-child relationships.

I'll provide a example example. "Sarah" contacted me and said she had been divorced for 15 years. She told me she had been happily remarried for five years, held a doctorate degree in mathematics and was employed equally a full-time professor. But she indicated she had a damaged relationship with her 15-year-old girl, "Julie."

In chronicling her story in my office, Sarah vacillated betwixt sobbing and seething with anger. She said that when Julie spent time with her biological begetter, "Michael," that he undermined Sarah'southward parenting boundaries, spoiled Julie and used every opportunity to denigrate Sarah. Sarah went on to say that she was worried because Julie was disregarding curfews and skipping classes, had been in problem with the juvenile court system and had recently been defenseless smoking marijuana.

When I contacted Michael, he presented with a jovial disposition. He stated he was engaged to be married and was employed as a plumber. He initially appeared supportive of his daughter. Although he said he didn't see any reason that Julie might need therapy, he indicated that he wasn't opposed.

When Julie's therapy sessions began, she insisted that she loathed her mother because Sarah was unreasonable. Julie stated that her mother grounded her for "footling" reasons such as skipping school and smoking marijuana. When discussing her father'south approach to parenting, Julie described Michael every bit a superb parent because he did not stoop to "ruining" her life. In addition, Julie mentioned that her father was planning on buying her a car. She stated that her father would talk with her and not carry out "ridiculous, over-the-top consequences for trivial, normal teenage mishaps."

Handling tips

Stride ane: The offset stride is to ask yourself if y'all possess the skills and advanced training to work with families engaged in transition and ongoing disharmonize. If not, that is OK. This is a good fourth dimension to seek referrals from colleagues who are comfortable with court-connected work.

Stride 2: When working with parents who are separated, divorced or are in the middle of a child-custody evaluation, counselors should request a copy of the courtroom orders prior to starting treatment with their children. Counselors should exist aware that some parents "therapist store" and are actively looking for a advisor who will tell them what they want to hear, not necessarily what is helpful. Some potential clients are searching for a advisor to align with them and join in with them about how atrocious their ex-spouse is. Counselors should keep in heed that failure to contact the child's other parent may introduce a host of problems (for instance, lath complaints), especially if the parent seeking treatment for the kid does non have the correct to exercise so per court guild. Also make certain to obtain all necessary releases before conversing with any previous counselors who have worked with the family members.

Step three: Counselors working with parents who are irrationally rejected by their children need to be well-versed in the literature. Failing to recognize and treat alienated children and their parents prolongs emotional damage for the child and tin damage the unabridged family organisation.

Step 4: As a counselor, you must know who the client is. Are you working with the child, the child and the parent(s), or i/both of the parents? It is vital to understand how the client ended up in your function. Additionally, your office must be articulate. Are yous working equally a courtroom-appointed counselor or a court-involved advisor? Recognize that in cases of child alienation, other parties — such every bit other counselors, attorneys or parenting coordinators — are often involved.

Stride five: Know your definitions, simply do not diminish your clients by labeling them. When conversing with other professionals, it is acceptable to refer to the parent to whom the child aligns as the "favored" parent. The "rejected" parent (or "target" parent) is the parent whom the child rejects or refuses to spend time with. When working with the courts, and depending on their jurisdiction, counselors may desire to apply behavioral descriptions, not diagnostic labels.

Counselors should remember to focus on behaviors that can be described. Although it is acceptable to discuss the concept of triangulation, gatekeeping, pathological alignment or irrational breach with your colleagues, it is not helpful to apply these terms with clients.

Step six: Do not diagnose if you take not actually met the client or witnessed the parent-kid interactions. For instance, if one parent seeks your services and reports that the other parent is alienating the child and is a narcissist and/or borderline, y'all cannot diagnose that other parent as borderline because you have non met with or witnessed that parent.

Therapeutic fallacies

Richard Warshak is a globe-renowned proficient on parental alienation. He has written endless peer-reviewed publications on custody disputes, divorce, alienated children and stepfamilies, and has developed educational materials. Warshak recently provided strategies that can guide counselors in working with this difficult parent-child dynamic. Co-ordinate to a study he published earlier this year (run into http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2015-27699-001/), several fallacies can compromise the therapeutic process.

• Children never unreasonably turn down the parent with whom they spend the virtually fourth dimension. The first fallacy counselors should recognize is that more time does not necessarily equal quality fourth dimension. Using rapid clinical judgment, it is like shooting fish in a barrel to conclude that a child identifies with the parent whom he or she sees the nigh. If counselors do non recognize this fallacy, they may make up one's mind that the parent must have done something that warranted poor handling by the kid. This line of thinking contributes to additional emotional distress. In turn, nether this assumption, counselors can go on the watch for flaws within the rejected parent to substantiate their beliefs. Counselors should be aware that when a child spends time with the nonresidential parent, that parent could be using that express time to teach the child to disrespect and disobey the custodial parent. To starting time this fallacy, counselors must cease thinking in unidimensional terms.
• Children never unreasonably reject mothers. Co-ordinate to Warshak'south written report, "Those who believe mothers cannot be the victims of their children'southward irrational rejection are predisposed to believe that children who refuse their mothers take good reason for doing so." He advises that counselors should keep an open listen almost both parents and consider that mothers may be rejected without good reason.
• Each parent contributes every bit to a child's alienation. Counselors should non generalize that both parents are always equally at error for a child's alienation. Counselors would not place equal blame for intimate partner violence on the victim. Likewise, it is not helpful to equally arraign both parents for a child'due south unwarranted rejection when 1 parent may be instigating the child'south deportment and attitudes.

One bias that comes into play is repetition bias. Those working in the field are permeated with the term "high disharmonize" and may deem that parental breach is synonymous with that term. Equally described by Warshak, the term loftier conflict "implies articulation responsibleness for generating conflict."

In my practice, I adult a nuanced view. At that place are times when both parents contribute to and could benefit from parenting education or family therapy. Even so, in the example of Sarah and Michael, Michael openly defied the court'southward orders, ultimately refusing to permit Sarah spend time with their girl. He besides denigrated Sarah in front of the child. I would not be practicing the concept of "not-maleficence" when working with Sarah if I were to suggest that she was at error. Demanding more of Sarah and blaming her only adds insult to injury.

As Warshak points out, "When the rejected parent's behavior is inaccurately causeless to be a major cistron in the children'south alienation, therapy proceeds in unproductive directions." At this bespeak, counselors may wonder, "What am I to do?" A counselor should remain neutral and avoid making unwarranted assumptions.

• Alienation is a kid's transient, brusk-lived response to the parents' separation. This fallacy is damaging considering child alienation may be accounted to be a normal byproduct of divorce that will resolve on its own. Prior to going into individual practice, I co-led a support group for adults who had lost all contact with their children. These cases were not due to a groundwork of abuse or fail; instead, many involved a contentious divorce.

Unfortunately, some counselors espouse the notion that the child should decide when to see the rejected parent and advise that over time, the kid will come around. In some cases, the child may re-establish a relationship with the parent. Nonetheless, not all children reconnect. And even if they practice, parents cannot reclaim lost time.

Counselors understand that they should practice within the scope of their license. In many states, counselors are prohibited from making access or possession determinations. Counselors do not have the correct to supersede a court order and tell an alienated child that he or she does not have to spend time with the rejected parent. Again, it is necessary to obtain a re-create of the customer's current court orders prior to starting counseling.

Another practice tip is that counselors should encourage the parent who is the target of unwarranted rejection to remain in constant contact with his or her children. Counselors tin also aid parents in knowing and agreement the stages of evolution and helping parents to formulate proper responses to a child's verbal insults.

• Rejecting a parent is a good for you short-term coping mechanism. Counselors tin can identify this fallacy by reflecting on common biases, many which are covered in counseling programs. Counselors must be cautious about the bias of wishful thinking because it provides a faux hope to clients. Equally Warshak (2015) explains, "Counselors who believe that rejection of a parent is a salubrious accommodation encourage parents to have the children's negativity until the children feel prepare to discard it." He goes on to say that "this is especially truthful when therapists assume that the alienation is destined to exist short-lived." Although we have specialized training as counselors, it is important to retrieve that we cannot predict future outcomes.

Some other way to think nigh parental rejection is to consider whether the parents would ignore their kid refusing to speak to one of the parents if the whole family still resided together. Understandably, most would find this unacceptable.

• Alienated adolescents' stated preferences should dominate decisions. This fallacy can be offset by using analytical thinking and a basic agreement of brain development. Many adolescents know more about adult matters than nosotros would desire them to know. Regardless, adolescents are not adults and should not brand adult decisions. Adolescents are prone to peer pressure and are in the process of discovering their identity. About adults cannot imagine asking if an adolescent would like to nourish school. As Warshak writes, "Adolescents' vulnerability to external influence is why parents are wise to worry about the company their teenagers keep."

Counselors tin can help rejected parents to not personalize it when a teenager has a soccer game and prefers to forego parent-child time. Or when working with a favored parent who claims the child does not enjoy fourth dimension with the target parent, counselors can point out that some adolescents exercise not enjoy their homework, but they are expected to practice it anyway.

Treatment goals and tips

When working with the child:

• Promote a healthy relationship with both parents.
• Help the child to correct cerebral distortions.
• Work with the child to maintain a balanced view of both parents.
• Ameliorate the child'south critical thinking skills.
• Recognize when a child's beliefs is incongruent from 1 setting to the next.
• Augment the child'south coping skills.

When working with the rejected parent:

• Recognize that the parent may feel misunderstood.
• Work with the parent non to counter-decline the child.
• Be aware of avoidance and passivity; the parent may want to escape the poor handling of the ex-spouse and the child by avoiding the problem altogether.

When working with the favored parent:

• Recognize there may be a role reversal. The child may exist coming together the emotional needs of the parent. Help the parent recognize his or her role as a parent and encourage the parent to appoint in adult relationships to find emotional support.
• Keep an eye open up for enmeshment. What might initially appear equally a healthy parent-child relationship could be extremely unhealthy. For instance, in that location may be a lack of customs or family support.
• Recognize that children generally do good from the involvement of parents, absenteeism corruption or neglect. Realize that some rejected parents may have personality disorders and continue to instigate court hearings or defy court orders.

The do's and don'ts

• Do not recommend a change in custody if one parent is behaving badly. Custody reversal may exist necessary in some cases, merely information technology is not the role of the counselor to make that determination.

• Do not align with ane parent over the other.

• Exercise cooperate with parenting coordinators and the courts.

• Do recognize that parents in litigation are likely to be working toward an adult-oriented consequence — namely to prevail in courtroom.

• Practise consider a variety of explanations when working with a child or teenager who irrationally rejects a parent.

• Practice not discard information that is inconsistent with the counselor's viewpoint.

*****

Monika Logan is a licensed professional person advisor living in Dallas who specializes in troubled parent-child relationships and sexual behavior problems. In addition to maintaining a private do and doing courtroom-connected work, she recently adult a programme to help youth in the criminal justice system maintain boundaries both offline and online and stay connected with their families. Contact her at mlogan@texaspcs.org.

mckinneythavess.blogspot.com

Source: https://ct.counseling.org/2015/12/parent-child-relationship-problems-treatment-tools-for-rectification-counseling/

Share this post